If you go to the State website at www.childcare.mt.gov you will see page after page of documentation trying to convince you of the “merits” of their programs, but what infuriates me is the same old song and dance trying to get me to believe that these Government run programs are part of Montana’s “ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT”. Just what increase to the economy does a government program give us? Of course it is logical to claim that a program for people to become educated to rise up out of poverty has merit but it is not really something you can call economic development. Expenditure of tax dollars in a local community would seem to help the economy of that community but at what cost? Currently Head Start employs over 50 people to run this program benefiting 211 children. Is that a good return on investment for the tax-payers? And is employing 50 people with tax dollars that were taken from the local community for Federal and State taxes really creating “economic development” or decreasing development? Or is it just re-circulating existing dollars in a back-handed redistribution of wealth scheme? The website further goes on to state that Head Start eases the frequency of employee absences as 21% of all missed work is caused by “family issues”, hence they are helping the economy by keeping people at work. I further wonder how all these “fact finding” missions, studies, and websites funded with tax dollars justifying their very existence cost the over-burdened taxpayer.
Be sure and take a look at yet another burocratic website www.childcare.mt.gov and give us your opinion.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, MY FOOT!
Interesting. Document written by educators full of fragments and poor spelling. Just shows how smart one gets with a college degree.
ReplyDeleteSeems like a lot of people employed basically providing daycare for 200 kids for 2 million dollars per year.
ReplyDeleteWe can educate them now, or pay for their prison terms later. I am willing to spend some preventive money now.
ReplyDeleteSurely you can't be serious about a program for 4 year olds being responsible for saving them from prison Anonymous?
ReplyDeleteYou must have a job writing this embellished tripe for government web-sites